| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
23/09/2019 |
|
Actualizado : |
23/09/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
NIELL, S.; JESÚS F.; DÍAZ , R.; MENDOZA, Y.; NOTTE, G.; SANTOS,E.; GÉREZ, N.; VERÓNICA, M.; CANCELA, H. |
|
Afiliación : |
SILVINA NIELL, Universidad de la República, CENUR Litoral Norte Sede Paysandú, DQL, PAAP, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú, Uruguay.; FLORENCIA JESÚS, Universidad de la República, CENUR Litoral Norte Sede Paysandú, DQL, PAAP, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú, Uruguay.; ROSANA DÍAZ, Ministerio Ganadería Agricultura y Pesca-DIGEGRA Montevideo, Uruguay; YAMANDU MENDOZA SPINA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GASTÓN NOTTE, Universidad de la República, CENUR Litoral Norte Sede Paysandú, DQL, PAAP, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú, Uruguay.; ESTELA SANTOS, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Ciencias, Sección Entomología, Iguá esq. Mataojo, Montevideo, Uruguay.; NATALIA GÉREZ, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Química, Cátedra de Farmacognosia, Gral. Flores 2124, Montevideo, Uruguay.; MARIA VERÓNICA, Cesio Universidad de la República, CENUR Litoral Norte Sede Paysandú, DQL, PAAP, Ruta 3 km 363, Paysandú, Uruguay; HÉCTOR CANCELA, Universidad de la República, Facultad de Ingeniería, Instituto de Computación, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Agroecology environment quality quotient (AEQ), an indicator of both, the beehive fitness and the contamination level of the environment by pesticides |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Ecological Indicators, November 2019, Volume 106, Article number 105448. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105448 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 2 March 2019/ Revised 3 May 2019/ Accepted 29 May 2019/ Available online 20 June 2019. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:Three years pesticide residues monitoring data in pollen, wax, bees and honey from sentinel apiaries in different agroecosystems in Uruguay were used for meta analysis. Support vector machines (SVM) algorithm was used previously to classify environments and is the basis of the present work. An useful indicator was developed to classify the contamination status of both beehives and associated environment. The index is a quotient between hive simple demographic parameters and the sum of toxic units for each pesticide found in it. The Agroecology Environment Quality quotient (AEQ) can be scaled in three different levels. When it is below 1, the hive will hardly develop in such environment. AEQ values between 1 and 2 indicate that the hive could have some restrictions to develop in such environment due to pesticide contamination but probably it will be productive. In the cases where the index is above 2, the hive will develop well in the environment where it is located. AEQ permits simultaneously to obtain different information. These are: the surveillance of good agricultural practices accomplishment in agroecosystems, the selection of the best environment to perform apicultural activities as well as to monitor the productivity and development of the beehives. |
|
Palabras claves : |
AGROECOSYSTEMS; BEES; CALIDAD DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE AGROECOLÓGICO (AEQ); INDICATORS; NIVEL DE CONTAMINACIÓN; PESTICIDAS; PESTICIDES; RISKS. |
|
Thesagro : |
ABEJAS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
T01 Polución |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02431naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1060205
005 2019-09-23
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105448$2DOI
100 1 $aNIELL, S.
245 $aAgroecology environment quality quotient (AEQ), an indicator of both, the beehive fitness and the contamination level of the environment by pesticides$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aArticle history: Received 2 March 2019/ Revised 3 May 2019/ Accepted 29 May 2019/ Available online 20 June 2019.
520 $aAbstract:Three years pesticide residues monitoring data in pollen, wax, bees and honey from sentinel apiaries in different agroecosystems in Uruguay were used for meta analysis. Support vector machines (SVM) algorithm was used previously to classify environments and is the basis of the present work. An useful indicator was developed to classify the contamination status of both beehives and associated environment. The index is a quotient between hive simple demographic parameters and the sum of toxic units for each pesticide found in it. The Agroecology Environment Quality quotient (AEQ) can be scaled in three different levels. When it is below 1, the hive will hardly develop in such environment. AEQ values between 1 and 2 indicate that the hive could have some restrictions to develop in such environment due to pesticide contamination but probably it will be productive. In the cases where the index is above 2, the hive will develop well in the environment where it is located. AEQ permits simultaneously to obtain different information. These are: the surveillance of good agricultural practices accomplishment in agroecosystems, the selection of the best environment to perform apicultural activities as well as to monitor the productivity and development of the beehives.
650 $aABEJAS
653 $aAGROECOSYSTEMS
653 $aBEES
653 $aCALIDAD DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE AGROECOLÓGICO (AEQ)
653 $aINDICATORS
653 $aNIVEL DE CONTAMINACIÓN
653 $aPESTICIDAS
653 $aPESTICIDES
653 $aRISKS
700 1 $aJESÚS F.
700 1 $aDÍAZ , R.
700 1 $aMENDOZA, Y.
700 1 $aNOTTE, G.
700 1 $aSANTOS,E.
700 1 $aGÉREZ, N.
700 1 $aVERÓNICA, M.
700 1 $aCANCELA, H.
773 $tEcological Indicators, November 2019, Volume 106, Article number 105448.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
23/05/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
23/03/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CANOZZI, M.E.A.; MEDEROS, A.; TURNER, S.; MANTECA, X.; MCMANNUS, C.; MENEGASSI, S.R.; BARCELLOS, J.O. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; AMERICA ESTHER MEDEROS SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SIMON TURNER, Animal and Veterinary Sciences Group, Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC), Edinburgh, UK.; XAVIER MANTECA, Department of Animal and Food Science, School of Veterinary Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain.; CONCEPTA MCMANNUS, Institute of Biological Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brazil.; SILVIO RENATO MENEGASSI, Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.; JULIO OTÁVIO BARCELLOS, Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Dehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle: A meta-analysis. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Review. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Production Science, 2019, Volume 59, Issue 5, p. 801-814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752 |
|
DOI : |
10.1071/AN17752 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
History Article: Received 27 January 2017 // accepted 11 April 2018 // published online 30 May 2018. -- Corresponding author: Barcellos, J.O.J.; Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande Do sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:julio.barcellos@ufrgs.br -- |
|
Contenido : |
Dehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain [ADG] or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting 7 studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), ADG (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions. © 2019 CSIRO. MenosDehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain [ADG] or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting 7 studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), ADG (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a pa... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ANIMAL ANALGESICS; ANIMAL PAIN; ANIMAL WELFARE; BEEF CATTLE; CATTLE. |
|
Thesagro : |
BIENESTAR ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02911naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1058621
005 2023-03-23
008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1071/AN17752$2DOI
100 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
245 $aDehorning and welfare indicators in beef cattle$bA meta-analysis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2019
500 $aHistory Article: Received 27 January 2017 // accepted 11 April 2018 // published online 30 May 2018. -- Corresponding author: Barcellos, J.O.J.; Centre for Research on Production Systems and Beef Cattle Supply Chain (NESPro/UFRGS), Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande Do sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:julio.barcellos@ufrgs.br --
520 $aDehorning is a common practice in cattle farming. Researchers suggest that pain during dehorning can be mitigated, although there is no conclusive evidence about the best technique and the best manner of pain relief. A systematic review-meta-analysis was performed to clarify the effect of dehorning on welfare indicators (cortisol concentration or average daily gain [ADG] or vocalisation) in beef cattle up to 12 months of age. Five electronic databases were systematically searched, as well as conference proceedings and experts were contacted electronically. Pre-defined protocols were applied during all steps of the systematic review process. A random effect meta-analysis was conducted for each indicator separately with the mean of the control and treated groups. Four publications reporting 7 studies and 69 trials were included in the MA involving 287 cattle. Heterogeneity between studies was observed for cortisol (I2 = 50.5%), ADG (I2 = 70.5%), and vocalisation (I2 = 91.9%). When comparing the non-dehorned group with amputation dehorning, the cortisol concentration was lower 30 min (P < 0.0001) and 120 min (P = 0.023) after procedure (0.767 nmol/L and 0.680 nmol/L, respectively). Local anaesthesia did not show a reduction in cortisol concentration at 30 min after dehorning by amputation. Non-dehorned animals had a tendency to decrease the number of vocalisation (P = 0.081; MD = 0.929) compared with the group dehorned by amputation. These results suggest that dehorning is a painful experience and that local anaesthesia did not alleviate short-term pain following dehorning. Further investigation into pain relief is required to improve confident decision making under practical conditions. © 2019 CSIRO.
650 $aBIENESTAR ANIMAL
653 $aANIMAL ANALGESICS
653 $aANIMAL PAIN
653 $aANIMAL WELFARE
653 $aBEEF CATTLE
653 $aCATTLE
700 1 $aMEDEROS, A.
700 1 $aTURNER, S.
700 1 $aMANTECA, X.
700 1 $aMCMANNUS, C.
700 1 $aMENEGASSI, S.R.
700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J.O.
773 $tAnimal Production Science, 2019, Volume 59, Issue 5, p. 801-814. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN17752
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
